Questions form the backbone of any investigation or analysis. Here is a guide to asking better questions in FMEA.
How To Conduct FMEA with Better Questioning
For those of you using Failure Mode Effect Analysis (aka FMEA) in your improvement work, I want to point out something could just possibly make your work here way more effective.
FMEA is only as good as the improvement you make!
So it stands to reason that your FMEA it is only as good as the solutions you produce and actually implement.
Let’s assume that your process for analysing failure modes is great. No, I’ll make that awesome.
What I want to do is focus on the solution end and help you to enhance the quality and form of the questions you ask to identify how you will treat the failure modes you choose to work on.
How do we do that?
Well first we must be clear on how FMEA works, and I want to do that by describing it through a metaphor.
Imagine for a moment that an event occurs, say the event is this – ‘tank water has become unfit for drinking in some supply system’.
This event is caused by a specific condition – bugs land and die in the tank water and contaminate it.
The outcome of this is people who drink the water get sick.
All of this takes place within an existing control environment that might be something like this.
- We spray for mozzies once each month
- Water is replaced every year
- People are taught to wash their hands, you know, there’s some education program in place around personal hygiene
We might visualise the scenario I just described like this.
So how do we treat this failure mode?
Obviously the best form of treatment is prevention and the second best is some form of mitigation. We would prefer to prevent it rather than deal with it after it’s occurred. We can visualise how prevention and mitigation interact with the model in this way.
This gives us the clues we need to develop the most effective question set when treating the problem. It leads us to ask 4 questions in this sequence.
- Q1. How do we prevent the actions or conditions that cause the event from taking place?
- Q2. How do we prevent the event occurring?
- Q3. How do we prevent the effect of the event?
- Q4. If the effect took place, how do we mitigate it’s impact?
Here are some examples of how these questions work.
Notice that each one of these questions results in a slightly different form of treatment.
Q1. How do we prevent the action or conditions that cause the event from taking place (the bugs)? We might …
- close the tank opening,
- fit fine gauze to openings,
- enclose the tank in a bubble,
- napalm all bugs,
- empty the tank of water …
Q2. How do we prevent the event occurring (unfit for drinking)? We might …
- flush the water frequently,
- nominate it as drinking water for cows,
- chlorinate the tank regularly …
Q3. How do we prevent the effect of the event (people getting sick)? We could …
- stop people from drinking the water,
- immunise people against illness,
- let people keep drinking it until they genetically evolve for drinking contaminated water,
- erect a nuclear waste sign at the tank,
- enforce the use of water purifying tablets,
- only give it to SAS soldiers (too tough to get sick),
- serve it at the next local politicians’ meeting (now we get something done) …
Q4. If the effect took place, how do we mitigate it’s effect / impact? Its possible that we could …
- insure against claims,
- appoint a 24 hour rapid response team,
- put people through an SAS toughening up course (I’m serious),
- only allow drinking on days off …
I think you get what I’m talking about.
Let me leave you with one thought:
If you choose to be brilliant in anything, be brilliant in how you ask questions.